In traditional phased software methodologies, test plans played a vital role in outlining objectives, scope, approach, and focus of the software testing effort for stakeholders. However, in agile projects, heavy documentation is not favored, and testers work collaboratively with the team. This raises the question of whether test plans are still necessary in the agile context. To answer this question, we must understand the distinctions between a test plan and a test strategy or approach. This article explores the significance of test planning and compares test strategy with test planning in the agile environment.
Test Strategy: A Long-Term Approach
A test strategy is a long-term plan of action, providing an overall test approach to projects. Unlike test plans, which are specific to each new project, a test strategy remains relatively static and seldom changes. It focuses on information that is not project-specific, allowing organizations to create a reference document for their testing processes. This strategy can be used to offer new employees a high-level understanding of the test processes employed by the organization. By capturing essential long-term information in the test strategy document, teams can minimize repetitive work while keeping the testing approach consistent.
Test Plan: The Power of Planning
The true power of planning lies in identifying potential issues, dependencies, and risks, enabling teams to address and mitigate them effectively. Test planning, regardless of whether a formal test plan document is created, is a crucial step in any project. Each project is unique, and a one-size-fits-all solution is not feasible. Thorough test planning ensures that risks and dependencies are considered, and the big picture is evaluated before the project commences. This approach allows teams to optimize their testing efforts and allocate resources more effectively.
The Need for Test Plans in Agile Projects
In agile projects, teams prioritize communication and collaboration over extensive documentation. Testers work closely with other team members, and the testing efforts are made visible through task cards or other agile tracking mechanisms. The question arises: do we still need test plans in agile projects? The answer lies in understanding the context in which test plans are required:
Contractual Obligations: In some cases, customers may insist on having a test plan document as part of the deliverables. For instance, when an organization is contracted to develop an application, the customer might require a test plan along with other documentation, such as requirements and design documents.
Complexity and Scale: Projects that are complex and large-scale might benefit from having a formal test plan. A comprehensive test plan helps ensure that all aspects of the testing effort are adequately covered and executed.
Regulatory Compliance: Industries that must adhere to strict regulatory standards may necessitate a test plan to demonstrate compliance and ensure proper validation of their products.
Documentation for External Stakeholders: In some cases, external stakeholders, such as auditors or regulatory authorities, may require a test plan as part of their verification process.
Comparing Test Strategy and Test Planning
While test strategy and test planning are distinct concepts, they complement each other and serve different purposes in the software development life cycle.
Purpose:
- Test Strategy: Provides a high-level, long-term plan for the overall test approach in an organization. It outlines the testing processes, tools, and methodologies used consistently across projects.
- Test Planning: Focuses on a specific project, addressing the risks, dependencies, and objectives unique to that project. It provides a detailed roadmap for testing activities during the project lifecycle.
Scope:
- Test Strategy: Encompasses broad testing principles, such as test types, testing levels, defect management, and resource allocation. It is not project-specific and remains relatively static.
- Test Planning: Tailors the testing approach to suit the specific project requirements, considering factors like project scope, timelines, resources, and risks.
Longevity:
- Test Strategy: Endures over time and requires updating only when significant changes occur in the organization’s testing processes.
- Test Planning: Is project-specific and undergoes continuous refinement throughout the project life cycle to accommodate changes and new information.
Stakeholder Communication:
- Test Strategy: Primarily aimed at internal stakeholders, providing them with an understanding of the overall test approach in the organization.
- Test Planning: Includes project-specific details, enabling effective communication with both internal and external stakeholders, ensuring everyone is aligned with the testing objectives.
Conclusion
Test planning and test strategy play crucial roles in ensuring successful software development and validation. In agile projects, the emphasis on collaboration and communication often renders extensive test plans less relevant, but certain scenarios still warrant their use. Test strategy, on the other hand, offers a stable and consistent long-term plan for an organization’s testing efforts.
Both test planning and test strategy are valuable tools that must be utilized judiciously, considering the unique requirements of each project and the organization’s overall testing approach. In conclusion, agile teams must strike a balance between documentation and agile principles, leveraging the power of test planning when needed and relying on a robust test strategy for the overarching testing framework.
For more information about agile testing, check out more videos from the AgileTest Academy series
If you love the testing experiences, try our app on the Atlassian Marketplace!
